Theoretical Examination in Architecture - The architecture is a noun. According to the rules of grammar, it's architecture is not taxable, awkward, not fair. So let's say or we see architecture as a verb. This is in line with the proposal of Van Peurseun in his book the strategy of culture (1976) about your culture. He argues do not see culture as a noun. Preferably as a verb. Nobody knew, perhaps from the tata said this could be incorrect. But if seen from the other side could also not wrong.
On landscape architecture practice, study about architecture is needed. Why? Because by understanding a real in-depth work, hopefully, we can make the work of architecture that is better than the existing one. Easy, learn from the experience. The nation of Japan, Korea and now the Chinese are very good at this. Sophisticated electronic tools are reportedly man-made state that its technology is advanced when it enters and then dismantled later learned. The next step was made electronics more pretty and sophisticated. Also, the price is cheaper.
In the theoretic academic, do a review of the whole process of architecture is a must. Why? In order to teach architecture with good and true, academicians should understand about this theoretic in depth. If not, it will be like what is the quality of his disciples? Another case if it considered it unnecessary. That has always been practiced without theorized it was often referred to as the mortgagee. Builders Engineers Architecture? It's an education first. Now? Artisan ST (Bachelor of engineering) architecture? That is if the output alias carpentry training school.
 |
| Architecture sketch |
It is said that knowledge of architecture born precisely from the practice. Originally indeed derived through a process of apprenticeship. Probably similar Empu Senduk that teaches how to make the mighty keris on his pupils. A beginner should be learned in a relatively long on a master builder before she can master what is exemplified by his teacher. Unfortunately in the process of the trial-error, if successfully often beginners above will be a copy of the master. In this process only very few beginners who can participate. Also, the capability to master in the mastery of architectural knowledge was often questioned. Not to mention the process of teaching, if now might be questionable is accreditations or ISO (International Organization for Standardization).
To open up wider opportunities for beginners and for the sake of improving the quality of this knowledge, architecture began to be included in higher education. Consequences are the knowledge of architecture should be able to theorize and in full responsibility of the nature of scientific level. Architectural knowledge is here, of course, emphasized on designing knowledge architecture. It is said that is why most of the educational institutions of architecture, architecture design studio assume that is the backbone of the entire learning architecture.
News of the cliche that is circulating, in the system of apprenticeship that taught only the approach and method of the design of an expert. On the University certainly must be different. Should be taught various-variety approaches and design methods that exist in the world of architectures. Thus students are expected to get broader insights. So definitely a formal education in different levels with training professions internships.
EmoticonEmoticon